| Page 
                      under construction and concept testing  Purpose. 
                      This series of pages is a look at what we think we know 
                      about the lives of an ancient people in order to draw lessons 
                      about life, ethics, and policy in the modern organization.
 As we 
                      argue elsewhere, human beings 
                      are evolving members of an evolving world. Not being the 
                      end of all creation, we bring with us genes and memes of 
                      the past and face a future for those that follow us that 
                      we can only influence, at best. We expect to confirm that 
                      organizations have universal problems to identify and solve, 
                      but that there have been few universal definitions and solutions 
                      to such problems. Approach/Methodology. 
                      This integration of what we think we know about the Anasazi 
                      experience is accomplished through the framework 
                      for assessing organizational ethics and compliance programs 
                      developed elsewhere in this Site. Taking this approach is 
                      limited, of course, by the data available to flesh out the 
                      framework itself.  We 
                      concentrate, for now, on the Anasazi (coming to be referred 
                      to as "Ancestral Puebloans"), native Americans 
                      who lived in the greater Four Corners area of the United 
                      States from approximately 6,000 
                      B.C. to 1350 A.D., where they then merged with large, 
                      plaza-oriented pueblos in the Rio Grande and western Pueblo 
                      areas. There will not be interviews, focus groups, and surveys 
                      of Anasazi Puebloans. Nor will there be document review 
                      beyond the pictographs, petroglyphs, and pottery they left 
                      behind. There will, however, be much value gained from site 
                      visits, inspecting and reflecting upon the villages and 
                      ruins left behind. As the 
                      series itself evolves, we will include, interpret and integrate 
                      photos from Anasazi ruins such as Keet 
                      Seel (pictured above), Chaco Canyon, Salmon 
                      Ruin, Aztec, Mesa Verde (both NPS and Mountain Ute), 
                      Hovenweep (including its outliers), 
                      Cedar Mesa (especially Grand Gulch), and Bandelier as well 
                      as other, less well-known Anasazi and modern Pueblo villages 
                      and ruins.  Organizational 
                      Context. First and foremost, the organizational 
                      context of the Anasazi was their environment. They were 
                      one of the people of mesa tops and canyons of the rugged, 
                      arid greater Four Corners area of the United States. Mesa 
                      Verde and Cedar Mesa (opposite) are two of the famous concentrations 
                      of Anasazi known by their association with mesas, initially 
                      and especially the mesa tops and the verdant side canyons 
                      off of them.
  Organizational 
                      Culture. The Anasazi were ingenious, 
                      though constrained by their environment or "organizational 
                      context," as are all organizations. If you look closely 
                      at the photo detail of Keet 
                      Seel at left, note the keyhole-shaped 
                      kiva in the middle and relatively crude construction 
                      of the rooms on the right along the street, but the ingenious 
                      retaining wall that supports the streets and the rooms on 
                      the left. In 
                      talks with one archeologist, he points to the lack of easily 
                      shapeable sandstone for the relatively crude Kayenta construction. 
                      Certainly the size of Keet Seel (possibly the largest residential 
                      Pueblo), the ingenuity of its retaining wall, and other 
                      unique innovations, such as the elbow deflector system (below 
                      right), point to sophisticated engineering techniques and 
                      social organization.
  The 
                      photo opposite is instructive. Note the relatively crude 
                      construction, probably a reflection of both culture and 
                      construction materials available. Deflectors are generally 
                      associated with kiva design, but the amount of smoke and 
                      t-shaped door suggest this was a dwelling unit. At least 
                      according to one Park Ranger, this is the only example remaining 
                      of an Anasazi elbow shaped deflector.
 It is 
                      particularly intriguing that Keet Seel was constructed in 
                      stages as new family groupings or clans arrived independently. 
                      Construction dates and the number of kivas at Keet Seel 
                      point to the acceptance of news groups into the village. 
                      The amount of presumably cooperative social action to lay 
                      the foundations, receive new comers, and maintain the whole 
                      might serve as a powerful example of organizational action, 
                      if we learn more.  Ethical 
                      Framework/Organizational Worldview. This Keet Seel experience 
                      was perhaps a more intense example of the very normal pattern 
                      of Anasazi family groups occupying and adapting previously 
                      constructed and abandoned pueblos. My favorite example is 
                      Salmon Ruin, where families journeyed 60 miles northeast 
                      from Chaco Canyon to build an outlier on the style of Pueblo 
                      Bonito between A.D. 1088 and 1094. They then abandoned the 
                      pueblo two to three generations later. It stood empty of 
                      human habitation for some 50 years until families from Mesa 
                      Verde reoccupied it temporarily and adapted it. The kiva 
                      above left is a classic example of this adaptation process. 
                      If one looks closely at its 
                      construction, one will see that it is a circular kiva, Mesa 
                      Verde-style, built within a rectangular room on the Pueblo 
                      Bonito style. It was decorated with murals, which were removed 
                      during excavation.
  Organizational 
                      Alignment. Archeological 
                      support for importance of the circle in human society. This 
                      tower kiva, a spiritual center of Anasazi life (a great 
                      kiva is just visible in the background), is located at Salmon 
                      Ruins, Bloomfield, NM. It has a particularly poignant story 
                      to tell.
 There 
                      is evidence of a tremendous fire that started in the wood 
                      and fiber roof of an adjacent room. When excavators reached 
                      this kiva, a tower kiva, they found to the skeletal remains 
                      of 42 children and one adult female. They hypothesize that 
                      she fled with the children in her care to the top of the 
                      two story tower kiva to avoid the fire, only to have it 
                      burn as well. She and the children were buried together 
                      when the kiva's roof collapsed below them.  In 
                      a much earlier era, the Arcahic in Cedar Mesa, another, 
                      more intimate tragedy is portrayed in the image opposite 
                      of a breech birth.This culture is described in detail below 
                      from the Cedar 
                      Mesa Project Web site.
  
                       
                        
                           
                            | "The 
                              earliest known documented inhabitants of the Cedar 
                              Mesa area in Southeastern Utah were the "Archaic," 
                              a highly mobile, low-density hunting and gathering 
                              culture, which depended on wild animals and plants, 
                              probably exploiting resources through seasonal movement 
                              using open campsites and natural shelters. Recent 
                              research indicates that they were moving through 
                              the area from B.C. 6500 to B.C. 1500. Excavations 
                              at Old Man Cave on the northeast edge of Cedar Mesa 
                              substantiate these early dates (Geib and Davidson 
                              1994:191-202). Members of this culture made stemmed 
                              projectile points for atlatl weapons and ground 
                              stone tools. More than 250 elements of abstract 
                              polychrome rock paintings found at the Green 
                              Mask site in Grand Gulch are attributed to the 
                              archaic period (Cole 1993:198-201)." |          
                       
                        |  "Following 
                          the Archaic Period, there was a substantial increase 
                          in population during the Basketmaker II Period (B.C.1500-A.D. 
                          400). Habitation sites, alcoves for camping, burials, 
                          and rock art, were located near arable land used for 
                          flood plain or dryland farming (maize and squash) and 
                          close to areas with a high diversity of wild foods (Lipe 
                          1993:1-10). Caves were used for camping, storage, burials, 
                          and rock art imagery. The San Juan Anthropomorphic st  yle 
                          pictographs and petroglyphs, large figures often with 
                          elaborate headdresses and/or necklaces and other body 
                          decoration can be attributed to Basketmaker II time 
                          (Cole 1993:201-218). Research suggests that during the 
                          late Basketmaker II period, (A.D. 50-400) small populations 
                          lived in egalitarian communities with an informal social 
                          organization. Pottery was not used during this period. 
                          The composite dart and the atlatl (throwing stick) were 
                          the principal weapons. The superior quality of workmanship 
                          and design attributed to the Basketmaker II people is 
                          remarkable and included coiled baskets, conical collecting 
                          baskets, twined sandals, and bags." Ethics/Compliance 
                            Outcomes. Under development. End 
                            of concept test to date. We truly believe in learning 
                            and growth in all that we do. Your comments or questions 
                            about this site, its content, and implications are 
                            important to us. Please drop us a line.  |    |